The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981,1991and 2001.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981,1991and 2001.

The given three circular chart reveal the information of changes in yearly expenditure by a particular UK school in 3 year: 1981,1991 and 2001. The data is calibrated in percentum. It is clearly and coherently reprensted.
It can be seen that: the school spended more money on teacher salaries that was two fifth in year 1981, and ten percentum increased in year 1991, but again deacreased five percentum in year 2001.Moreover, insurance rise in whole year that was grow up 2 percentum to 8 precentum
It is crystal clear: furniture and equipments sharps fall one in ten in first ten year, tgen remain same in year 2001: moreover resources and book rised in 1991, and then surged to decrease that was less than one in ten in year 2001. Respectively other workers salaries school spens approximately less than third in 1981, and then more than a fifth in 1991. It was very down in year 2001 that was less than fifth.
Overall, it is evident that uk school spend more money on teacher salaries

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-06-28 Baljeetkaurji 56 view
2018-06-28 Anureet kaur 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'chart' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The given three circular chart reveal the information of changes in ye...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
... deacreased five percentum in year 2001.Moreover, insurance rise in whole year that was ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
..., insurance rise in whole year that was grow up 2 percentum to 8 precentum It is cr...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, then, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7183908046 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64315961931 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 156.33193362 43.030603864 363% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180740000552 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974554865554 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11092915974 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147648798286 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863402233792 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.