The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991, 2001.
The given three circular charts depicts the information about the variations in the total expenditure, which was made in five different amounts by a particular UK school in the year: 1981, 1991 and 2001.
It can be seen that in the year of 1981, the maximum amount (40%) was used for giving salaries to the teachers however, it increased by 10% in the next decade and remains at the highest position. In addition, the expenditure made for furniture and equipments decreased to 5% in the year of 1991, which was 15% in the previous decade. Moreover, the least amount of money was utilised for insurance that was 2%, 3% and 8% in the year of 1981, 1991 and 2001 respectively.
As far as trend was concerned, the other workers' salaries were more than a quarter in the year of 1991 but, it decreased by 6% in the next decade. Further, in the year of 2001, the money spent for giving salaries to other employees declined to 15% whereas, expenditure made for furniture and equipments inclined to 23%.
Overall, it is evident that the maximum amount of money was spent on teachers' salaries however, the money utilised for insurance was the mimimum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-28 | Kalerbabal | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Kalerbabal | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 78
- Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means other believe that these games are contributed to children development.the discuss both view and give your apinion 67
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantage of throwaway society outweigh any possible economics advantage? 61
- The diagrams below show how glass containers , such as bottles , are produced and recycled. 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991, 2001. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71641791045 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60435287446 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487562189055 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.8946058523 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.428571429 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13354087971 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764968199992 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938695743215 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104192555375 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112609343761 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.