The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

The three given pie charts illustrate the changes in yearly expenditures by one British school in 1997, 1991 and 2001.

First of all, spending on salaries of teachers remained the highest cost over the whole 20-year period. However, there still were slight alterations in allocation of budget. For instance, if I annual emoluments of tutors was 40%, by 1991, it had reached exactly half of expenses. After 10 years, this number insignificantly decreased to 45%. By contrast, the lowest percentage was allocated on insurance, which was estimated to only 2 percent in 1981. In the next decade, it was almost the same. Nevertheless, ratio of money spended on insurance rose considerably, reaching four times as high amounts of expenses as in 1981.

Compared with salaries of teachers, a particular school expended negligible more than a quarter of budget on other workers. This percentage declined afterwards to roughly fifth of expenditures. Gradually, and monuments of nontutors fell to 15% by 2001. Likewise, resources such as books, which had equal ratio of location in the beginning, had only one dance of the whole costs.

Thus, within 20 years, despite dropped expenses on educational materials and other workers, the spending for insurance, teachers increased substantially.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, still, thus, for instance, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38118811881 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97521457618 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673267326733 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2756251114 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6153846154 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5384615385 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206505560869 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570569871359 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863018833664 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132236346808 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119594450649 0.0819641961636 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.