The pie charts compare the yearly expenditure changes for a certain UK school in five different categories in 1981, 1991, and 2001 in percentages.
To begin with, it can be clearly seen that in 1981, teachers’ salaries and other workers' salaries were the highest. During this 20 years period, teachers’ salaries fluctuated between 40% and 50% while other workers’ salaries constantly reduced from 28% to almost half in the same years. Furthermore, the only which did not show any decrement is insurance and it rose from 2% to 8%.
To continue with, when it comes to resources e.g., books and furniture and equipment, although resources e.g., books increased from 15% to 23% between 1981 and 1991, it fell considerably to 9% until 2001. On the contrary furniture and equipment reduced from 15% to 5% first 10 years, after that, a sharp growth was observed.
In conclusion, it is understood from the graphs that all given school spending had some variations, nonetheless, the minimum change is seen for teachers’ salaries while the largest is insurance for that particular school.
- The diagram below shows the process of using water to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Deforestation caused by human activity is happening in many parts of the world with serious results for the environment What do you think can be done to solve this problem Support you opinion with reasons and examples from your own knowledge and experienc 67
- The chart below shows the aid from six developed countries to developing countries from 2008 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., first, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, while, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15730337079 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79301073685 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640449438202 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5915705405 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.142857143 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.1428571429 5.23603664747 270% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205632316112 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913019197933 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110447671349 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143336053961 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118808926424 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.