Traditional Vs Modern housing
East or West, home is the best. Whether your house is an old, traditional one, or a modern, big house, It will be the best for you. However, given the choice, I would prefer to live in a contemporary one. This is because modern houses are more convenient and require better quality of everyday life.
Personally, I had grown up in an old traditional house of my grandparents. Honestly, our life was not easy, while living there as I did not have a separate room and had to share one with my brother. We have now got a new apartment, which is structured in a way that makes us feel comfortable in our own house. Each of us has a separate room, and due to the big number of rooms, my little sister even has a colorful gaming room with abundant toys. So, I really favor the new ways of structuring apartments that is exclusively made for making people’s life accessible.
Moreover, today’s houses accumulate all the primary facilities that the dwellers might need. As I mentioned above, living in our former house was a hardship. We did not have a dishwasher and not even an air conditioner. In our current house we have both the dishwasher and AC, which enhances our daily life. We use the dishwasher when we have a myriad guests and the air conditioner in the extreme hot summer days On top of that, we have a permanent availability of water and gas in our house, which was a struggle in the traditional one. That means, we can use water and gas whenever want. I think that these facilities are of vital importance for any dweller.
In conclusion, although I am not belittling the ones who live in traditional houses, I would rather live in a modern, well-designed apartment that makes my life more easy-going and comfortable.
- Many different countries have most shops and products as the same. Some consider it a positive dvelopment, whereas others consider it negative. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 11
- Agree / disagree 3
- The given chart 67
- You are planning to study abroad. What do you think you will like and dislike about this experience? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far out-weight the disadvantages. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
honestly, however, if, moreover, really, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 5.60731707317 696% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 965.302439024 149% => OK
No of words: 311.0 196.424390244 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62379421222 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85114191965 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 106.607317073 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556270096463 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 283.868780488 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 1.53170731707 979% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8629182007 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5882352941 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184369089032 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621060171347 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811028847942 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128493577009 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722194707175 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.