the trend of owning electronical appliances and the average weekly amount that households in one nation spent on doing housework
The line graphs show the trend of owning electronical appliances and the average weekly amount that households in one nation spent on doing housework in the period of 100 years.
It is clear that there were significant changes in both the proportion of families using electronical appliances and the amount of time they spent on doing chores over the 100-year period. While the percentage of ownership of all three appliances has risen steadily, the amount of time that those who spent on doing housework has witnessed a considerable drop.
In 1920, the figure for households with washing machines, refrigerators, and vacuum cleaners were roughly 40, 2 and 30 percent respectively. Over of following 60 years, the respective proportions of families these machines increase singnificantly to approximatly 65, 100 and 90 percents. By contrast, the number of hours of doing housework has saw a significant decrease by around 35 hours, stood at 15 hours in 1980.
From 1980 to 2019, whilst there were steady up-ward trends in terms of the ratio of households using washing machine and vacuum cleaner, the figure for refregerator remained relatively stable. Finally, in 2019, the quantily of families using both refregerator and vacuum cleaner stood at 100 percents and the figure for washing machine was just above 70 percents after a long fluctuating period. Furthermore, the amount of time people devoted to do housework fell slightly to about 10 hours over the same 40-year period.
- music 56
- the trend of owning electronical appliances and the average weekly amount that households in one nation spent on doing housework 84
- Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successfull and have a clean environment Orther disagree Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
... number of hours of doing housework has saw a significant decrease by around 35 hou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23430962343 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89415771459 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560669456067 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3689920968 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5555555556 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345719985887 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154499670349 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.212199757511 0.0843802449381 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281833981957 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.265469243687 0.0819641961636 324% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.