The two maps below show the changes to Melvin Island between 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show the changes to Melvin Island between 2000 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided map depicts that the changes of melvin island and comparison of two islands given the duration of 10 years from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, it is evident from the graph that the melvin island was more developed compare to the past 10 years and an airport was constructed in the year 2010. Marina was built in last 10 year, while some of the buildings were completely replaced in 2010.
According to the map that the airport was newly built facility in the melvin island and the marina was constructed near the village in southern area of island. However, seafood restaurant was completely replaced by tearooms. swimming pool and spa were newly built facilities which were replaced by one farmland, while chalets were newly constructed facility that was replaced by garages.
Moreover, The area occupied by woodland in 2000 underwent noticeable transformation by the year 2010 where in the woodland located on the northern part of the island was converted into a golf course and that in the eastern region was cut down to half and the remaining half on the southeast was cleared to pave way for the airport.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (26 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-29 nobitaa 67 view
2024-02-26 Wardiati Yusuf 73 view
2023-12-25 nguyendangquang.aspect 78 view
2023-12-18 vuongthaolinh 85 view
2023-11-26 lethianhthu 73 view
Essays by user sanket4857 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...Marina was built in last 10 year, while some of the buildings were completely replaced in 2...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Swimming
...nt was completely replaced by tearooms. swimming pool and spa were newly built facilitie...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85863874346 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54930277843 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507853403141 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.514784777 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.571428571 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148613642256 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874231815498 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102600671312 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128530591318 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111292776988 0.0819641961636 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.