The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Given are two maps demonstrating the same island while the first one is before and the second one is after the construction for tourism.

Looking at the first picture there was a hug island with a beach in the west. The western and eastern areas surrounding the center had a plenty of coconut trees, and they grew from the north to the south of this island. The island total length is approximately 250 meters.

Moving on to the second picture there is a lot of buildings have been constructed on the island. There are 6 in the west and 8 in the center. Between them, there standing a restaurant in the northern shore and a central reception block surrounded by a vehicle track which goes down to the pier. From this harbor, tourists are able to go sailing around the southern sea. Besides, a footpath connecting the western accommodation units also leads to the western beach where visitors could swim.

Overall, comparing two maps, there is a significant transformation of this island after construction. Not only a big amount of facilities has been built but the sea is also used for relaxing activities. Therefore, this new island has become a good place for tourism.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, second, so, therefore, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80882352941 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72980244978 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1551809963 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.75 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155575581589 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512345103032 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488691430056 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992678174521 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048886835394 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.