The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The two maps show us the same island, while the first is the original island, the second is how it looks like after the construction of tourism.
On the first map, what we can see is merely a huge and wild island, which is approximately 200 meters in length, surrounded by the sea and a beach in the west.
Moving on to the second one, what we notice is the appearance of many buildings. Now there is a pier in the south as an approach to the island. Going straight ahead from the pier, we meet the reception block, which is surrounded by the vehicle track. And from there, we can go north in a vehicle to the only restaurant. On either side of the reception block are the accommodation areas, one in the middle and one on the left of the island. Both have the footpath on which you can walk to other units. The beach in the west now has been used for aquatic activities. Tourists can walk west there from the left lodging area. And the last is the eastern part, opposite to others, remains untapped.
In general, there has been a significant change on the island. It is no longer a desolated one. Transformed for the tourism purpose, the island would be soon filled with people and funs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.3963963964 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42544876686 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7263353573 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.7142857143 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115889670798 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369925596153 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565815405113 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882092660984 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720991506717 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.94 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.