The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The maps compare changes in city hospital between 2007 and 2010.

To sum up, the car park were separated into staff and public. Moreover, more facilities were added.

In 2007, there was a Ring road which is around city hospital and connected with hospital road in the south direction of city hospital which surrounded by bus stop. Car park for staff and public was built in the eastern side of Hospital road. Moreover, the city road was connected with the hospital in the south.

In 2010, the city hospital area, ring road, hospital road and city road were remained, while bus stops were removed. The car park in 2007 were turned into the car park for staff and public car park was built in the eastern side of city hospital which connected with the ring road. Roundabouts were added between ring road and hospital road and city road.Moreover, the bus station was constructed nearby the two roundabout in the western side.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...compare changes in city hospital between 2007 and 2010. To sum up, the car par...
^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Car) must be used with a third-person verb: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...pital which surrounded by bus stop. Car park for staff and public was built in the e...
^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ng road and hospital road and city road.Moreover, the bus station was constructed nearby...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, while, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80124223602 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28532605399 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 68.0 106.607317073 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422360248447 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2628583327 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8888888889 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222958187859 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123758721419 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864149842643 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161687793764 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967790372269 0.0819641961636 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.25 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.