The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

The maps illustrate the way to go to a city hospital in two different years.
It is clear that there were significant changes in road access to the city hospital shown on the maps. There were new roundabouts and facilities in the year 2010.
In 2007, the city hospital was surrounded by a ring road and there was a road in the south that leads to a city road. We also see that a car park was used for both staff and public that located next to the south road and the city hospital. Bus stop was along the hospital road.
In 2010, there were two new roundabouts locating in the ring road and the city road. Moreover, public car park was moved to the east side of the hospital while staff car park was in the same position. The bus station also was changed, it was opposite to staff car park and between two roundabouts.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-19 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-06-10 bassmodulators123 73 view
2024-03-28 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-03-28 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-03-27 minhnhat2002 84 view
Essays by user Daniel3003 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f car park and between two roundabouts.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 668.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.28205128205 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25560883204 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455128205128 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8659222395 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.2222222222 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214762746732 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114340933857 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725532277529 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1526594901 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028503054806 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 13.2329268293 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.25 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.1 8.06136585366 76% => OK
difficult_words: 16.0 40.7170731707 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.