The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to city hospital; in 2007 and in 2010.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps illustrate road access related to a city hospital changed considerably in its form in 2007 and in 2010.
It is obvious that the city hospital has expanded by a public car park which is located on the northeast of the map. Bus station and two roundabouts have a crucial role in to access of vehicles to the whole of the city.
As can be seen, the size of the city hospital did not change in 2007 and in 2010, while two roundabouts at the entire end of hospital Rd which has to bus station located next to it. The bus stops has two availability to the north and the south of Hospital Rd which in the south has a junction by city road. A public car park located close to the city hospital that has its own entrance on the east of the ring road in 2010. Another entry is for the staff car park. These two staff car parks and public car parks separated with each own entry in 2010. By 2010 there were six bus stops that were demolished.
As a result, the new city hospital has more facilities with better road accessibility.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-10 bassmodulators123 73 view
2024-03-28 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-03-28 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-03-27 minhnhat2002 84 view
2024-02-28 rslmsayu 11 view
Essays by user Ahmad_off :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, as to, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.23232323232 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3397306155 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464646464646 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4245908461 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253068336735 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11473633064 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082521653626 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188069441633 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781093938627 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.25 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.