The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The give diagrams display the route to get to the city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
In general, significant alterations have been made with the addition of new facilities such as the bus station, two roundabouts and a public car park.
It is apparent that no changes were made to the city hospital as well as the staff car park. However, the six bus stops on both sides of Hospital Road in 2007 were removed 3 years later. Instead, a bus station was constructed to the Southwest of the hospital. Linked to the bus stop were the newly added roundabouts, which connected Hospital Road with Ring Road and City Road.
It can also be seen from the map that the car park of the hospital has gone under several changes. The old car park, which was shared between staff and the public, were now exclusive to the hospital’s workers whilst a new public car park was built on the East side of the city hospital.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-11 | Atefeh 1248 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant In 2010 there were 750 000 visitors residi 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, in general, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49696969697 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40052029867 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9186182705 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.75 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157665393074 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796574012219 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565948370796 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104632205116 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612348295481 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.