The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The given maps illustrated how road entrance to a town hospital has developed over two different time periods (2007 and 2010).
Overall, road access had not any considerable increase in size. Meanwhile, there was some significant changes in infrastructure, locations and facilities over the given period.
In 2007, the hospital of city was located in the centre which was covered by the Ring Road that still remained the same as in 2010. Furthemore, there were totally six-bus stop along two sides of the Hospital Road. The car park used for both staffs and public which lied south east of the town hospital.
As can be seen from map in 2010, the two roundabout was built at the beginning of the Hospital Road to its junction with the City Road. The parking area was extended to different separated spaces, one is in the east side of City Hospital for public and one used for staffs was not moved. In addition, to the south west of City Hospital, there was a bus station which can be lead from two aspects of the roundabouts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-28 | niloya | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-12 | minhtran0610 | 67 | view |
| 2018-10-30 | reza_fattahi | 73 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement ? 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70718232044 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52025765867 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3175202678 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215699488089 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979805069959 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755170882375 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14117946833 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054043142632 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.