The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.

The two given maps illustrate how the road leading to the city hospital was changed between 2007 and 2010.

Overall, even though no increase in size in the roads was made, there were three obvious main replenishments on the surrounding infrastructure.

It is clear from the map that the car park which was used for both staff and public citizens in 2007 was separated into two distinguishable areas in 2010, namely public car park which was on the East of the hospital and staff car park which remained in the same zone.

Meanwhile, there were six bus stops constructed in a row along two sides of the Hospital Road in 2007, but in the next three years, they were all substituted by two roundabouts located in the conjunction of the Hospital Road and the Ring Road as well as that of the Hospital Road and the City Road. Instead, those bus stops accessing to the two roundabouts was gathered and moved into the left-hand side of the Hospital Road.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: buses; busses
...ame zone. Meanwhile, there were six bus stops constructed in a row along two si...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, well, while, as well as, as well as that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67455621302 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62084091745 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.6562139948 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.0 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393209346637 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222676996426 0.103423049105 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140985544652 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234385004855 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159275811053 0.0819641961636 194% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.