The given two maps illustrate the road network around a City Hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Overall, it is noticeable that the road access to the city hospital had been upgraded in 2010 with the addition of a bus station, two roundabouts and a separate public car park.
In 2007, the hospital road, which had three bus stops on the either side, was connected to the city road and to the ring road. Furthermore, a common car park was located on the east side of the hospital road, and it served both public and staff members. In 2010, some significant changes could be seen. Firstly, the common car park was assigned exclusively for the hospital staff, while a novel public car park was established on the east side of the hospital. Secondly, two roundabouts had been constructed at both ends of the hospital road; one at the intersection with the ring road and other at the city road junction. Finally, the three bus stops on either side had been removed, and a new bus station was constructed on the west side of the hospital road with connections to the both newly built roundabouts.
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on publictransport systems To what extend do you agree 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Line graph number of visitors per month in summer 2013 In thousands 86
- Unemployment is one of the biggest problems of contemporary society What do you think are the main causes of unemployment What solutions can you suggest 11
- This bar chart shows the number of private cars in millions of different cities from 1950 to 2000 Write a report 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the both newly built roundabouts.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64948453608 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56363376656 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474226804124 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4606567653 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202448339808 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118675690546 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916859811032 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208099295297 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639652993716 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.