The two maps compare the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012
The maps illustrate how a school campus changed between 1985 and 2012.
Overall, the campus experienced significant changes during the period, the most important of which were the reconstruction of a car park and a playing field and the addition of school amenities. In addition, there was also a sharp increase in the number of students in 2012.
To begin with, the office in the north-west corner of the campus still existed while the library to the west and the smaller car park adjacent to it was demolished to make way for a computer room and a green space in the middle where trees were planted. The campus also witnessed the expansion of the classroom block into a three-storey building in the east of the school.
There used to be a rectangular car park in the north of the campus, but then it was redeveloped into a semi-circular one, which was accompanied by the removal of the path connecting to the playing field in the south. The playing field itself underwent a reduction in its size to build two more classroom blocks, swimming pool and a fitness centre.
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 78
- MORE AND MORE CHILDREN IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES ARE BECOMING OVERWEIGHT THIS IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN WEALTHY COUNTRIES CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF THIS TREND 89
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts compare the number of people per household in the UK in 1981 and 2001 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7339545892 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547872340426 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1939023066 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242567822841 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130948586837 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155999593147 0.0843802449381 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197765943962 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179938610197 0.0819641961636 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.