The two pictures show the changes of buildings in Liberton Doc's between 1980 and present. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two pictures show the changes of buildings in Liberton Doc's between 1980 and present. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

the two given maps in new Straight the changes took place in Liverton Docks between the year of 1980 and the present.

It is obvious that the entire docks have been reconstructed. Two new bridges have been built on the right of the map, across the river which is in the middle of the map and leads to the coast. One more interesting feature is that the ships appearing a 1980 map all have disappeared.

Looking at the opposite side of the river on the two maps to warehouses and two cranes have been demolished and replaced by the new buildings, a club, and kids playing area. with regard to the other side, a new path has been built along the river and lots of the new facilities have been erected including a selling shop converter buildings apartments and a parking area.

Overall, the purpose of Liverton Docks has been altered from commercial shipping, which is the original function, to entertainment purpose.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-25 tuanly 61 view
2018-12-08 Duc Anh 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the two given maps in new Straight the chan...
^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...ildings, a club, and kids playing area. with regard to the other side, a new path h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing area. with regard to the other side, a new path has been built along the rive...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70987654321 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56701818863 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549382716049 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5950755504 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0901169397224 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490686359741 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560016422973 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668177270854 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644078794753 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.