The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sector in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
The Charts illustrate the online shopping of different things in the various kinds of retail sectors of Canada from 2005 to 2010. The data calibrated in percentage.
Have a look on the year of 2005, electronics and appliance sector accounted for the majority of online sales about 35% whereas, it dropped with the difference of 5% in 2010. In case of food and beverage, just above less than a third percent people were choosing to purchase this atium in last year however, before inclining it kept on 22%.
By having a glance on home furnishings, a quarter percent online sale had done by this in initial year but with in the time period of five years it was 10% lesser than as compare to the former year. Afterwards, the sale of video games was just under a fifth and 23% noticed in first and last year respectively.
Overall, most of the people gave preference to the electronics and appliance as well as food and beverage rather than the others.
- The Charts summarise the weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 71
- Some people say that cars should be banned from the centres of city Do you agree or disagree 80
- With a fast pace of modern life more and more people towards fast food for their main meals Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 76
- It is generally believed that education is of vital importance to the development of individuals and the well being of societies What should education consist of to fulfil both these functions 75
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by chienese people between 1985 and 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, third, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63313609467 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53337375127 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609467455621 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.507369066 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.857142857 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218799274237 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102857128781 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14367071645 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139055554754 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134135017918 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.