The two pie charts show the proportion of sales of online shopping in 4 categories, namely Electronics and Appliance, Food and Beverage, Home Furnishings and Video games, in Canada between 2005 and 2010.
It is obvious from the graph that there was a difference for both the most and the least sales in this period.
The majority of online shopping sales in 2005 was Electronics and Appliance at 35%, while Food and Beverage became the top of sales in 2010, at 32% of total sales. Similarly, the worst selling item in 2005, in fact 18%, was Video Games but Home Furnishings was bought by Canadian at 15%, which was the lowest percentage, in 2010.
The Electronics and Appliance dropped by 5% to 30% between 2005 and 2010. This decrease rate was the percentage that Video Games increased within 5 years. A similar pattern was repeated in Home Furnishings and Food and Beverage. In each case, around 10% declined in Home Furnishings and a rise in the same rate for Food and Beverage.
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010 Sports boys 6 11 boys 12 16football 87 78basketball 35 78
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
- Too much money is spent on maintaining and repairing old buildings Some people think that they should be knocked down to give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76162790698 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5887374635 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2626671842 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175553398191 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08039917106 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876174760673 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125712266856 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927565196288 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.