The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrated the comparison of the percentage of online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. Overall, there are the trend changes between 2005 and 2010 remarkably.
To begin with, in 2005 the most sector of online sales is electronics & appliance (35%) and video games as the nethermost (18%).
In contrast, in 2010 the trend had changed significantly, while the most sector of online sales had taken place by food & beverage which it reached 32%. At the same time, the percentage of electronics & appliance sectors lean to degenerate more than 4% than previously. Furthermore, while in 2005 home furnishings sectors were positioned as the second rank of the percentage which it attained 25%, in 2010 it just gained 15% and was assigned as the last rank.
Finally, in 2010 the percentage of video games sectors gravitate to escalate tremendously which it added more than 4% and had succeeded to uplift its position from the last position to the third rank.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | dolzoo | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | saadipk90@yahoo.com | 89 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010 71
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison 11
- Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information. Far from being beneficial, this is a danger to our societies. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 11
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, second, so, third, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96987951807 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75423289076 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3639890706 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.857142857 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237162276753 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135743126992 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152924668162 0.0843802449381 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172540143258 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143406865703 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.