The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two pie charts compare the proportion of employees and self-employed divide by genders during the year 1992 in great Britain.

Overall, the graphs indicate that the percentage of non-manual managerial and professional were the most popular employment among males, whereas the females were interested in work as a clerk or related job in the given year.

According to the graphs, men had the highest proportion of craft or similar jobs at 24% as opposed to 3% for women. There were more men than women worked in managerial and professional sector at 36%.In contrast, women were more focused on clerical and related professions at 31% as against only 6% by men.

In the case of general laborers, the proportion of males and females were almost equal at 2% and 1% respectively. Similarly, the figures for other manual jobs hovered at 27% for both the genders. When it comes to the other non-manual jobs the figure for females was 4% higher than that of men at 9% during the year 1992 in great Britain.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-09 Alex mathew 93 view
2019-09-12 Milan karki 78 view
2019-09-12 Milan karki 78 view
2019-08-28 abcdefg123456am 11 view
2019-08-20 madi82 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the most popular employment among males, whereas the females were interested in w...
^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or similar jobs at 24% as opposed to 3% for women. There were more men than wome...
^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...nagerial and professional sector at 36%.In contrast, women were more focused on cl...
^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... men. In the case of general laborers, the proportion of males and females were...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, whereas, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86705202312 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68764372294 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589595375723 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6128338546 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0833195206618 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504686532925 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857021379985 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786565575025 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995501607745 0.0819641961636 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.