The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two pie charts illustrate the six job categories of both sexes in great Britain in 1992. The employment pattern was divided into manual and none manual which includes craft or similar, general labours, and another manual,managerial and professional, clerical or related and another none manual.

Overall, majority of females are employed in clerical or related section which is about 31% whereas, most of the males are engaged in managerial and professional role around 36% in great Britain over the given year. The least percentage of people are worked in general labours in both sex which is about a mere one or two percent.

Regarding manual employment in males was craft or similar and other manual workers are approximately 26% and 24% respectively, in contrast to 27% and 3% in females.

Similarly, none manual employment like clerical or related job of males was only 6% which is 30% lower than females. In addition, other none manual career of males was 6% when females consists of 9% in same category.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-12-18 mnaufaln 67 view
2021-11-12 eyraen 78 view
2018-05-11 niki05 81 view
Essays by user eyraen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivided into manual and none manual which includes craft or similar, general labou...
^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , managerial
...lar, general labours, and another manual,managerial and professional, clerical or related a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her manual workers are approximately 26% and 24% respectively, in contrast to 27%...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, similarly, whereas, in addition, in contrast, in general, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07100591716 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80318535145 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556213017751 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4173825012 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.428571429 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 5.23603664747 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106407646244 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616927866756 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746015868826 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652804768154 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495291943139 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.