The two pie charts show the types of communication used in 1962 and 1982. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparation where relevant.

The two pie charts depict the modes of communication used in 1962 and 1982. Overall it would be appropriate to say the most significant shift of communication was from letter to the phone. While computer usage was doubled but didn't accounted for the majority of the usage in both years.

In 1962, the most popular mode of interaction was by letter which occupied 50% of usage. While in 1982 phone was the most common medium of communication having 60% which out numbered the letter and computer in significant manner.

On the other hand, in the 1962, computer was least used compared to all the three at only 15%. Analysing in the year 1982, the letter usage was drastically reduced and accounted to only 10% of usage in overall means of communication.

It is clear that due to advancement of technology, people have mostly shifted to the electronic means of interaction instead of written communication which used to be main .

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e. While computer usage was doubled but didnt accounted for the majority of the usage...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tten communication which used to be main .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92452830189 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83211907191 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559748427673 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8623455849 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162397917547 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920132340875 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114139088958 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102810020878 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421943774936 0.0819641961636 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.