The two plans below show the Pancha village in 2005 and 2015
The given maps illustrate the development in terms of house, road and educational institutions that occurred in Pancha village, over a decade period between 2005 and 2015. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the village was completely changed, except for the housing area in the west of Pancha that remained stable over the period.
In particular, in the northeast corner, the first noticeable change that could be seen that primary school was extended to primary and secondary school. In the southeast corner, the pagoda was added one house and was converted into three ones in 2015. Whereas, In the western area, the market witnessed no major change apart from the fact that some sections was rearranged with three additional buildings.
Besides, the block of flats, situated in the west and in the middle of the map, was nearly untouched, but two houses were knocked down in the middle. The land way in the middle was demolished to make way for the construction of the pedestrian crossing with traffic signs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... one house and was converted into three ones in 2015. Whereas, In the western area,...
^^^^
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ranged with three additional buildings. Besides, the block of flats, situated in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, second, so, whereas, apart from, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96511627907 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52363087985 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6866071267 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108021691251 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466353543258 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509277658218 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716048051249 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639955255955 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.