US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996.
The pie chart gives information about US expense patterns along 30 years specifically between 1966 and 1996. There were 7 sectors will be figured out and measured in percentage. Overall, as can be seen that the most positive movement is obviously in cars sector whilst the most dropped down trend dramatically happened to be in food category.
Regarding to the data, in 1966 the highest expenditure had to be spent in food sector at 44% while the second sector after that happened to be plotted in cars automotive cost which stood at 23%. The both sectors followed by furniture expense which got 10% and almost similar with petrol cost at 9%. US people also spent their money to get satisfying food at restaurant, it happened to stand at 7%. They were also setting aside their money to buy some books and computer stuffs, just 6% and 1% respectively.
On the other hand, compares to 1996, cars and its automotive had to be the most sharply increased sector which made up tp 22%. Same case as in computer and restaurant sections, both were rising up to 9% and 7%. In contrast, the most declined trend was absolutely in food category which got down to 30%. It is followed by the percentage of books sector which 5% lower than former. Two last sectors that also dipped down happened to be in furniture and petrol sectors were slightly got down to 2% and 1%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-11 | eva2106 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-15 | Arshdeepmondair | 100 | view |
| 2020-12-15 | Arshdeepmondair | view | |
| 2020-03-13 | destrarastra | 67 | view |
| 2020-03-13 | Fuad Allatif | 73 | view |
- UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008 78
- British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to english in 2000 and 2010 67
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 73
- The figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, second, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64730290456 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49739452047 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560165975104 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8164831653 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103204989654 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437749693356 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103655554222 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848293644519 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07449435782 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.