The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996.
The circular charts underneath clarify the average of US spending pattern between 1966 and 1996. Unit measured in percentage.
A quick look at both of the pie charts is quite enough to make it clear that the consumption of Cars was the highest financing of US. However the lower value were computers in the first year and Book in the second year mentioned above.
Based on the first circle chart, it showed Food dominated almost more than two fifths, accordingly put it on the first place in 1966, turning to the second place was Cars which had less than a quarter, followed by Furniture that was obtain one in ten, Petrol placed in the fourth which had almost one in ten, while the total amount left filled by Restaurant (7%) and Computers has a percent.
In the comparison with 3 decades later on 1996, Cars was growth and make them become highest expenditure, it was reach in the value of more than two fifths, followed by Food which had nearly less than a fifth, that means it decreased from nearly more than two fifths in 1966, then Computers increased almost one ten digits. Before Computers, Restaurants placed equal with food in the second place which has similar number. And the minorities are Petrol and Furniture are eight, a percent in Book we could find this Book was decreased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...f Cars was the highest financing of US. However the lower value were computers in the f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'obtained'.
Suggestion: obtained
...quarter, followed by Furniture that was obtain one in ten, Petrol placed in the fourth...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'become the highest'.
Suggestion: become the highest
... on 1996, Cars was growth and make them become highest expenditure, it was reach in the value ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, look, second, so, then, while, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69736842105 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35288520553 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.784164364 43.030603864 274% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.875 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 5.23603664747 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170246686552 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941610835897 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174805481786 0.0843802449381 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158119467987 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176751554076 0.0819641961636 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.