Visitors to a Local Cinema According to Age
The pie chart depicts the proportion of movie watchers with accordance to age in a local cinema in year 2000.
Overall, it is clearly shown that the cinema was often visited by different age group with the majority being in the age group of 55 years and above.
Half of the total movie viewers came from the population of older adults who are 55 years and older, representing the largest figure on the pie chart. Interestingly, children aged 10-15 ranked second having almost a quarter of the total watchers, followed by the age group of 16 to 20 years with 15%. The least who went to see movies were the young adults, 21-30 years old and middle-aged who were 31-45, constituting to 8% and 5% respectively.
Taking everything into account, most people who spent time watching movies were the older adults and children to adolescents aged 10-20 years.
- Comparison of Energy Production The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years 92
- Estimated Sales of Jeans in Turkey and Their Projected Market Share 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ame from the population of older adults who are 55 years and older, representing the la...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81081081081 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54843511759 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628378378378 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.3488288334 43.030603864 33% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219980458328 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121169962224 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115438424995 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16385570348 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116385362892 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.