Visitors to two music sites on the web.
The line graph gives information about the number of visitors to two different music websites: Pop Parade and Music Choice in 15 days. As can be seen in the graph, the number of visits to Pop Parade is higher than that of Music choice. Otherwise, there was a sharp fluctuation in the number of access times to Pop-parade during the time.
Pop Parade website had 120,000 access times while Musical Choice only received one-third of its views. At the end of the period, Pop Parade gained estimated 170,000 visits in comparative with 70,000 access times in Musical choice.
Without regard to this, the figure of visits at Musical choice increased between day 2 and day 3 while that at Pop Parade remained steadily overall. In contrast, from day 5 to day 9, the number of visitors to Music Choice experienced a wide fluctuation between 20,000 and 40,000. Both of the websites’ visitors then hit their highest number of 150,000 for Pop Parade and 120,000 for Music Choice.
- Visitors to two music sites websites 81
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- The pie charts below compare the water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 84
- The main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990. 56
- Overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The ratios of two melody websites in a 1...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od is depicted through the line graph. It is undoubtedly perceptible that the n...
^^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fluctuation') instead of another adjective.
...n that of Music choice. Also, there was a sharply fluctuation in the number of access at Pop-parade d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... access at Pop-parade during the time. As it is visible in the illustration, Po...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0,000 access times in Musical choice. Without regard to this, the figure of vi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82941176471 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77271056467 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.2993428019 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.625 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128971518474 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636183219431 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400634375485 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757932511252 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249095572552 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.