Water usage in Sydney
The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the proportion of the water consumed, divided by purpose of use in Sydney, Australia in 1997 and 2007.
In general, the consumption of water which is used for manufacturing and domestic took up the larger percentage while other sectors were reduced after 10 years. However, food industry remained accounting for a largest proportion of total water use in both 1997 and 2007.
In 1997, the percentage of food industry was the highest with 48%, which is compared with the remaining four sectors. Manufacturing, service industry and household use came in the second with 13%, 15%, 19%, respectively. Meanwhile, only 5% of total water produced was used for building industry.
There were the significant changes in the purpose of using water in Sydney, which was recorded in 2007. It is true that people gave more priority to using water for daily life and production. From 13% in 1997, the proportion of manufacturing dramatically rose to 25% and became the second priority sector after food industry. The figure of domestic water experienced the slight increase to 21% after 10 years. Whereas, the ratios of water used for food production and service industry were reduced 7% and 4% to 41% and 11% in 2007. Actually, building industry continued to be the smallest percentage of total use consumption with only 2% in the last year recorded.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
..., food industry remained accounting for a largest proportion of total water use i...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, second, whereas, while, in general, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07522123894 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78974844279 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504424778761 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.46081248 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5833333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254689203287 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110427801734 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767002824716 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195979643448 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789010709441 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.