When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless
to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
These days, it has become a fashionable trend for a country trying to develop its technology. However, at the same time, this condition has changed and made several aspects such as ability as well as the way of life ignored by society. some argue that it will be useless to make it up or keep it sustains because automatically technology brings a lot changes to the society. Personally, I strongly disagree that technology will bring negative impacts for a country when a country tries to adapt it. I will explain that in this essay according to my opinions and views.
Firstly, technology takes a vaccinating role in the global society, especially for a country. A country that tries to adapt technology as the foundation of lifestyle indirectly traditional aspects will improve and a country will find a platform to promote their culture globally. For example, japan as a country shows progressive development in technology by creating many variations of technology. japan still makes their culture known well by people around the world. At the same time, a lot of findings or creations were done by experts in japan but traditional skills or the way of life still remain same.
Furthermore, technology helps to promote cultural and traditional aspects from a country. Today there are many countries tend to use technology to introduce their culture as well as their lifestyle in different parts of the world. For instance Indonesia, Ministry of Information and technology succeed to promote culture and indonesian lifestyle in South East Asia region during SEA Olympiad by using the internet and mobile television. Based on research by indonesian media association 25,000 people reached because the way of advertising by using technology.
In conclusion, even though some people still believe that technology will change a lot of aspects of a country but I believe that technology supports a country’s development, society to be introduced, and make a country well known worldwide when a country develop technology in the right way.
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointlessto try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
- Some people think that books are losing importance as a source of information and entertainment. To what extent do you agree? 56
- Today, more people are traveling than ever before. Why is this the case? What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... as the way of life ignored by society. some argue that it will be useless to make i...
^^^^
Line 1, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...say according to my opinions and views. Firstly, technology takes a vaccinating ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Japan
...creating many variations of technology. japan still makes their culture known well by...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 5.60731707317 410% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 965.302439024 179% => OK
No of words: 331.0 196.424390244 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22960725076 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96802232858 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 106.607317073 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498489425982 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 283.868780488 195% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8810063983 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184999704985 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694955258793 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555628060296 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12290177691 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602261929639 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 40.7170731707 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.