Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree

Nowadays, with the advancing of modern technologies and the vast economical growth experienced by the majorities of countries as well as cities all around the world, it is by no denial that the increase in social problems has becoming more and more obvious. A numbers of experts propose the idea of constructing factories and transporting the employees to the countryside. In my opinion, even though there are still a manifold of factors that need to be taken into account, I still fully agree with this proposal.

Cities are, without a doubt, becoming more and more crowded every single day. The high population density resulted from emigration from both oversea and national has increased the demand for accommodations, and in return increase the competition and pricing. The reason for this, one that is not often recognized by many, is the fact that most economical attraction are built and situated in cities. A wide numbers of employees from third world or developing countries end up living on the street or slums because they can't afford to rent an apartment or flat. By moving factories to the countryside we can thin out the intense insistence for shelter in cities, and most industries like rubber manufacture doesn't require cities to thrive.

Another problem with densely populated cities is transportation, both in cost effective and convenience. Constructing factories in far away rural areas can help diverse and divide the traffic, with will then solve traffic jams. The business owner's vision also play an essential role here, because by setting up business at specific location can decrease travel time for many, and lead to the rise in productivity.

Some may make the counter argument that countryside might not be developed enough to set up factories or power plant, and or will limited the living standard of workers. But they forget the fact that by setting up these institutions, the rural areas can grow economically and socially, which might give birth to another city. We can clearly see that the advantages do in fact out weight the disadvantages, as a matter of fact this is one of the most effective choice for new start up.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ing of modern technologies and the vast economical growth experienced by the majorities of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ing on the street or slums because they cant afford to rent an apartment or flat. By...
^^^^
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...most industries like rubber manufacture doesnt require cities to thrive. Another p...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
...o the rise in productivity. Some may make the counter argument that countryside m...
^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'limit'
Suggestion: limit
...p factories or power plant, and or will limited the living standard of workers. But the...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, then, third, well, in fact, as a matter of fact, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04469273743 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81454487785 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58938547486 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.8115304866 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124201200473 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406465084481 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041278323891 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071520499171 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016417524214 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.