You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The chart shows the average number of hours each day that Chinese, American, Turkish and Brazilian tourists spent doing leisure activities while on holiday in Greece in August 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of time each day that people spent doing activities on holiday in Greece in August 2019 from four various countries. The activities include going to the beach, traveling, and reading books.
In general, even though the total time spent by the whole four nationalities was equivalent, their interest in activities was different.
According to the chart, we can see that the most favored activity of both the Chinese and the Americans is reading books. When an American dweller spent five hours a day reading books, even higher for a Chinese with eight hours per day. The time a Turkish and Brazilian tourists enjoyed this activity was the same and was a bit lower with 4 four hours.
The average amount of time spent at the beaches fluctuates from 3 to 6 hours ascending from Chinese tourists to Brazilian tourists. It can be seen that visiting places was the least preferred activity when the longest time spent on this activity was only 3 hours a day in the case of American and Turkish tourists. It was even lower for the Chinese and the Brazilian tourists, just an hour and two hours a day respectively. The bar chart illustrates the amount of time each day that people spent doing activities on holiday in Greece in August 2019 from four various countries. The activities include going to the beach, traveling, and reading books.
In general, even though the total time spent by the whole four nationalities was equivalent, their interest in activities was different.
According to the chart, we can see that the most favored activity of both the Chinese and the Americans is reading books. When an American dweller spent five hours a day reading books, even higher for a Chinese with eight hours per day. The time a Turkish and Brazilian tourists enjoyed this activity was the same and was a bit lower with 4 four hours.
The average amount of time spent at the beaches fluctuates from 3 to 6 hours ascending from Chinese tourists to Brazilian tourists. It can be seen that visiting places was the least preferred activity when the longest time spent on this activity was only 3 hours a day in the case of American and Turkish tourists. It was even lower for the Chinese and the Brazilian tourists, just an hour and two hours a day respectively. The bar chart illustrates the amount of time each day that people spent doing activities on holiday in Greece in August 2019 from four various countries. The activities include going to the beach, traveling, and reading books.
In general, even though the total time spent by the whole four nationalities was equivalent, their interest in activities was different.
According to the chart, we can see that the most favored activity of both the Chinese and the Americans is reading books. When an American dweller spent five hours a day reading books, even higher for a Chinese with eight hours per day. The time a Turkish and Brazilian tourists enjoyed this activity was the same and was a bit lower with 4 four hours.
The average amount of time spent at the beaches fluctuates from 3 to 6 hours ascending from Chinese tourists to Brazilian tourists. It can be seen that visiting places was the least preferred activity when the longest time spent on this activity was only 3 hours a day in the case of American and Turkish tourists. It was even lower for the Chinese and the Brazilian tourists, just an hour and two hours a day respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-20 | maiphuong060802 | view | |
| 2023-04-29 | bhatt00 | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | Desi Sari Ayuni | view | |
| 2023-02-14 | Desi Sari Ayuni | view | |
| 2023-02-13 | evaerdalina | view |
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, well, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 7.0 386% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 6.8 309% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 3.15609756098 475% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 5.60731707317 482% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 33.7804878049 195% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2862.0 965.302439024 296% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 597.0 196.424390244 304% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79396984925 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94303383012 3.73543355544 132% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55677680856 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.172529313233 0.547539520022 32% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 858.6 283.868780488 302% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 1.53170731707 783% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 8.94146341463 302% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9051236434 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.740740740741 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 10.0 3.83414634146 261% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 3.70975609756 485% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296281452566 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132336416303 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640846370674 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187425919711 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982493529571 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.65 8.06136585366 70% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.