You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The line graph shows the percentages of Australian export with four countries.
The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012
You should write at least 150 words.
The given line chart illustrates the proportions of Australian commodities sold abroad to four distinctive regions in the period of 12 years from 1990 to 2012. Overview, most Australian goods were conveyed to Japan, as opposed to India with the least stuff import from Australia. It is also noticeable that the position of Japan was taken place by China later.
In terms of the figure for Australian exports to China, in 1990, its figure started at roughly 26%, after which saw a minimal plunge to 20% in the next 5 years. From 2000 to 2005, the figure made up 18% and stayed unchanged until 2005 and ended with the figure being recorded at 16% in 2012
The proportion of Australian items exports to the remaining countries started the period lower with 4% for India and China, 11% for US. After 10 years, the ratio of Australian exports to India remained untouched, and two remaining countries grew to varying degree with the figure being recorded at 5% and 12% respectively. From 2005 onward, the proportion of stuff conveyed to US dipped substantially and ended with the figure being recorded at around 7%. By contrary, China which observed a consistent increase to 30%, which was double the figure of India in the final year
- Nowadays a large amount of advertising aimed at children should be banned because of the negative effects To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now What problems will this cause What can be done to solve these problems 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82547169811 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56743770773 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561320754717 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0913128487 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.875 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188736526615 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855806391593 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551562612353 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133360101902 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100251805244 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.