You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam.
Write at least 150 words.
The map illustrates the change that have taken place in a town after the hydroelectric power dam was built from 1990 to 2010.
Most noticeably, the once forest, and ancient structure in the North Western and the mountain in the North Eastern of the town has now been transformed in to lake, hydroelectric dam and hotel. The increased number of power poles over the period indicate the significant rise to the town energy usage.
In 1990, there was a river in the middle of the town. On the left side of the river, there was a rare plants and animal’s area, next to that portion was the ancient structure. There also a forest and mountain on the upstream on each side. On the right side of the river, there was an irrigated farmland and a village next to it.
Turning to the present scenario, the river now has been cut down into haft. With the addition of the lake on the North area and a hydroelectric dam in front of it, is can be seen that the town are now changed to be able to create power. Irrigated farmland is replaced by the hotel. The villages are now located near the river. There are power poles next to the villages. They also appear on the left side of the river.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-08 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | naufalrahman96 | 61 | view |
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 11
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38636363636 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36647993288 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486363636364 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8822016164 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.2307692308 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 5.23603664747 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13470014673 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463454492663 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654202079443 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106239603976 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765067847993 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.89 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.