You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figure for 2025 and 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The table illustration how many people who have nationality of Argentina, Indonesia, Italy, and Republic of Korea which has recorded in 2003 and predicted for 2025 and 2050. While Argentina's and Indonesia's population is calculated to increase in 2025 and 2050, the population of Italy contries will decrease and Korea's population will grow very slightly.
The number of Argentines and Indonesian is rise steadly as projected figures. While Argentina population in 2003 is only 34 millions people, this figure is predicted to growth doublely to 48 millions in 2025 and 62 millions people in 2050. Similarlly, in 2003, Indonesia had 238 millions people, this number will rise to 274 millions in 2025 and 312 millions in 2050 as prediction. In contrast, population of Italy and republic of Korean will drop as the projection. This number was 54 millions for Italy in 2003. It will drop to 47 millions and 45 millions people in 2025 and 2050 respectively. On the other hand, the number of Korean people was 48 millions in 2003. This figure will grow slightly to 52 millions people, then remain the same in 2050.
In conclusion, the number of Argentina's and Indonesia's netizens is increse significantly while Italy's population will drop slightly. This number is a litter greater in 2025 when compared to 2003 and same as in 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-01 | tragiang0606 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | tragiang0606 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | tragiang0606 | view | |
| 2022-12-27 | adamneyul | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | adamneyul | 67 | view |
- https ieltsonlinetests com wot result writing practice test 4 996019
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study in universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figure for 2025 and 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below gives informaton about underground railway systems 56
- The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figure for 2025 and 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00452488688 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81154639018 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447963800905 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4398530538 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173377354735 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801596008799 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475857446345 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125429524989 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284278639697 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.