You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic.
Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world, while other claim that some information is too important or too valueable to be shared freely. In this essay, I wil discuss the question from both points of view and give my own opinion.
On the one hand, some people argue that there are several benefits of sharing as much information as posible in scientific research, business and the academic world. The fisrt one is that it help people to become more intelligent, not out of date with the times. Another major advantage is that helping richer with some scientific research, business and the academic world. From new searchings, archaeologists or explorers will earn a huge some of money from auction and sale to the public with their new discovery. Just a little discoveries, anonymous people can become a famous people. Besides, with a few scientific research, it can help citizens in many fields such as education, health, economics, create conditions for the countries to stronger development.
On the other hand, it can be argued that sharing some important information are not good. Fisrtly, if the informations fall into the wrong hands, they will use that information to threaten the government, create dangerous for citizens. In addition, there are several scientific information will create conflict between the great countries for personal gain. People often have this opinion is that.
In conclusion, both argument have their merits. On balance, however, I agree with fisrt reason. This is because it will keep the world safer than share information with the public instead of the personal interests of the dicoverers
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-02 | Huyền Tăng | 73 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 w 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (wil) must be used with a third-person verb: 'discusses'.
Suggestion: discusses
... be shared freely. In this essay, I wil discuss the question from both points of view a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'discovery'?
Suggestion: discovery
...with their new discovery. Just a little discoveries, anonymous people can become a famous p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18996415771 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77144613105 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530465949821 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 283.868780488 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2752918622 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368129434187 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120108753826 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144016645983 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234281623191 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129426525339 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (wil) must be used with a third-person verb: 'discusses'.
Suggestion: discusses
... be shared freely. In this essay, I wil discuss the question from both points of view a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'discovery'?
Suggestion: discovery
...with their new discovery. Just a little discoveries, anonymous people can become a famous p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18996415771 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77144613105 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530465949821 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 283.868780488 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2752918622 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368129434187 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120108753826 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144016645983 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234281623191 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129426525339 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.