The
The pie charts below illustrate the percentage of people around the world in 1900 and 2020. It is obvious that the number of population increase dramatically from 1.6 billion in 1900 to 7.5 billion in 2020.
Even though the data of human in Middle East and North Africa is not presented in 1900, there was a substantial rise by 6% in 2020. The number of Asian went up slightly from 60% in 1900 to 54% in 2020. There was a considerable upward trend in the percentage of African from 4.5 % in 1900 to 10% in 2020. The number of population in Latin America climbed markedly from 3% in 1900 to 8% in 2020 and the others increased minimally by 0.5% in 2020.
On the other hand, there was a steep fail in the percentage of people in Europe from 25% in 1900 to 14% in 2020. At the same time, the number of North American stayed constant at 5% in 1900 and in 2020.
- the bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 78
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences through out the day in 1992. 61
- The 50
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 73
- Traffic and housing problems should be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 700.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.26829268293 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37989744437 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.7625682078 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.49 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.