The bar chart below gives information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The graph shows data about the number of adult British people who donate money to charities in the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, donations from the three younger groups of people declined remarkably in 2010 compared to 1990. In contrast, donating people went up in the two older groups. In the 1990 middle-aged people donated more among all groups, and in 2010 it is above aged people who donated more.
Firstly, around 17% of youth between the ages 18 to 25 donated in 1990 compared to that of about 7% in 2010. Similarly, 26-35 aged people declined by around 10% in donations between the years. More than 40% of 35-50 age grouped people who donated in 1990 fell by around 5% in 2010. These are the people who contributed for more donation in 1990.
On the other side, older people of age groups 51 to 65 and above 65 are highly interested in donating as their numbers increased by 5% and 3% respectively between 1990 and 2010. 51 to 65 age people account for more donations in 2010, followed by 35 to 40 age group and above 65 age grouped people with 35% each.
- The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experienc 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 84
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to s3x and age.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 56
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Other, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98.The second chart shows their destinations over the same period. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, similarly, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 26.3917525773 178% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 937.175257732 94% => OK
No of words: 194.0 206.0 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5618556701 4.54256449028 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2910791058 2.54303337028 90% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 127.690721649 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.622605031667 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 290.88556701 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.782464825 44.8134815571 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 76.5299724578 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 16.8248392259 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 4.34317383033 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195647931594 0.216113520407 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109135241288 0.0766984524023 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461841324382 0.0603063233224 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155588806548 0.12726935374 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344143021117 0.0580467560999 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 8.37731958763 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 70.7449484536 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 7.45979381443 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 8.71597938144 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 7.59969072165 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 41.2886597938 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.