The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates three types of media, which are used mostly for different ages to find news in a country in 2011.
Overall, social networking and radio are two types of media that many people in different ages use most while micro-blogging is rarely used.
First of all, the percentage of using social networking in the age of 10-17 and 18-29 was the same number, which was about 80% in the same year. Secondly, the figure of using social networking in people who around 30-49 was lower than 50% and followed by the group age of 50-64 to over 30%. Thirdly, only the group of age from 65 above had the lowest proportion of using social networking, which took only 10%. Moreover, the percentage of radio in three groups of age among 18 to 64 was higher than 90% in 2011. The number of using radio in people who 65 or higher was lower than these three groups by 5% approximately. Furthermore, the age of 10-17 placed the lowest point, which had 20% in the same year.
On the other hand, the group age of 10-17 and 18-29 were two groups that used micro-blogging to 20% and 25% respectively. In addition, the three groups left used micro-blogging, which the percentages were lower than 20%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch the percentages were lower than 20%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.03092783505 297% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 937.175257732 105% => OK
No of words: 215.0 206.0 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58604651163 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56019367845 2.54303337028 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483720930233 0.622605031667 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 290.88556701 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 19.4733150747 44.8134815571 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.6 76.5299724578 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 16.8248392259 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3 4.34317383033 283% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2140665782 0.216113520407 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105987617879 0.0766984524023 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082822982168 0.0603063233224 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178456186982 0.12726935374 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913338849109 0.0580467560999 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 8.37731958763 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 70.7449484536 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 7.45979381443 106% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 8.71597938144 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 7.59969072165 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 41.2886597938 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.