The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart illustrates how many beds per thousand of people in hospitals, while the table highlights the government spending on health care and the average life expectancy in various countries.
At first glance, the more hospital beds one has, the higher life expectancy citizens are, while the less amount of expenditure on health per person.
On average, Japan ranks first in the number of hospital beds among eight regions, which accounts for around 14 beds for 1000 people. Next comes Germany, which occupies just over 8 beds for 1000 people. This figure is nearly twice as high as that in the Netherlands. Nevertheless, the least number of hospital beds goes to the US, at just under 3 beds. In addition, there are around 4, 4, 3, and 4 beds in Australia, Canada, Spain, and the UK per 1000 people respectively.
Turning to the table, while only $2581 spent on health care per person in Japan, there is the highest life expectancy (83 years) in this country. Conversely, the figure for money used for health in the US is about 3-fold as high as that in Japan. Also, the US has the lowest life expectancy, which makes up exactly 78 years. Besides, 3481 dollars are used for health to keep people alive until being 80 years old.
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 78
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 75
- In the past sports champions used to be motivated by the desire to win a match or to break the world records These days they are more likely to be motivated by prize money and the opportunity to be famous What message does this send to young people and ho 89
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, first, if, nevertheless, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 937.175257732 109% => OK
No of words: 217.0 206.0 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69585253456 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45584507024 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 127.690721649 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 290.88556701 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8850818024 44.8134815571 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6363636364 76.5299724578 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 16.8248392259 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 4.34317383033 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0667653587516 0.216113520407 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264646833826 0.0766984524023 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327676216866 0.0603063233224 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519298486047 0.12726935374 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346730006755 0.0580467560999 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 8.37731958763 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 8.71597938144 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 7.59969072165 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.