The chart below shows the changes that look place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates alters in three different areas of offence in Newport city centre during the period between 2003 and 2012. It can be seen that burglary increased higher numbers than other crimes during the period. It is measyred numbers.
In 2003, burglary and car theft's crimes stood at the numbers of 3500 and 3000 respectively. Robbery from people was around the amount of crisis 600 in that year. By 2004, three type of crimes were rose dramatically in high numbers. Burglary grew significantly number of around 3700 in that year than other offence. But afterwards, burglary crimes dropped rapidly numbers of 2500 in 2006. In that year, car theft saw sharp decline in the number of 2000 and robbery crime witnessed less number of incidents during the period. In 2005 and 2010. There was slight growth in robbery from people in the number of 700. In 2008, burglary experienced small decline thev number of 1100 and until 2012 this crime saw steady fluctuation was around 500 or 700. Car theft increased minimally in the number of 2500 in 2010. By 2012 in Newport city happened a lot of crimes in car thefts were around 2600 than other car theft years.
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what to extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In some countries an increasing numer of people are suffering from health problams as aresult of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with t 56
- The chart below shows the changes that look place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...3500 and 3000 respectively. Robbery from people was around the amount of crisis 6...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 937.175257732 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 206.0 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78109452736 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33667774195 2.54303337028 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 127.690721649 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 290.88556701 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 16.3608247423 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.155703227 44.8134815571 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.6428571429 76.5299724578 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3571428571 16.8248392259 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 4.34317383033 12% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.29896907216 47% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140125453876 0.216113520407 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531141769917 0.0766984524023 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746373094436 0.0603063233224 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148614942598 0.12726935374 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596148244673 0.0580467560999 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 8.37731958763 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 70.7449484536 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 7.45979381443 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 8.71597938144 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 7.59969072165 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 41.2886597938 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 8.62886597938 64% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 8.54432989691 89% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 8.15463917526 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.