the chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008
The bar chart illustrates three separate ways of refuse disposal in particular European country between 2005 and 2008.
Overall, while the amount of waste disposed by landfill and dumping in sea observed a significant decrease, there was a small rise in the level of refuse treated by the method burning from 2005 to 2008. Additionally, incineration was the most popular method of disposal at the end of the given period.
In 2005, starting at 70 million of tons, the level of waste disposed by putting the refuse into land was recorded the largest amount, and this figure was 15 million of tons more than that of refuse treated by dumping in sea. Meanwhile, approximately 65 million of tons was presented in the same year.
The level of refuse disposed by landfill continued fall significantly from exactly 60 million of tons in 2006 and ending to 40 million of tons in 2008, making it the lowest amount at the end of the recorded year. Likewise, there was an exponential decrease to precisely 40 million of tons in the amount of waste treated by method dumping in sea in 2008, after a stability of half million of tons in 2006 and 2007. By contrast, in 2008 the level of waste disposed by incineration contributed approximately the same figure at the start of the given period, at 65 million of tons, after a remarkable drop of 30 million of tons
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000. 67
- Some people think that government should give financial support to artists, musicians, poets. Others think it is a waste of money. Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
- the table below shows the amount of waste production millions of tons in six different countries over the twenty year period Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 26.3917525773 220% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 937.175257732 120% => OK
No of words: 237.0 206.0 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73839662447 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69052776024 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434599156118 0.622605031667 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 290.88556701 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 16.3608247423 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8765380102 44.8134815571 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.375 76.5299724578 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.625 16.8248392259 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 4.34317383033 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226570998613 0.216113520407 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122852616522 0.0766984524023 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904880755437 0.0603063233224 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181861028011 0.12726935374 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931867491283 0.0580467560999 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 8.37731958763 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 7.45979381443 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 8.71597938144 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 7.59969072165 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 8.54432989691 159% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.