the charts below changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003
The two pie charts compare the percentages of energy generated from six different sources in a country in 1985 and 2004.
Overall after 17 years, oil was still the dominant source for energy production despite a significant decrease in its proportion. Conversely, this country became more dependent on natural gas,coal and renewable sources.
In 1985, over half of energy was produced from oil-the most popular source, and this figure exactly quadrupled that of natural gas with only 13%. Meanwhile, nuclear power was the second most used source, providing nearly a quarter of the total energy volume. However, after nearly two decades, while the use of two major sources in 1985 decreased markedly to 39% for oil and a modest 8% for nuclear power, that of natural gas saw a 10% increase.
Regarding other sources, the amount energy produced from coal accounted for a negligible percentage of 8% in 1995, and then experienced a nearly threefold rise to 22%, making coal the third largest source in 2003. Renewable sources and hydro power each contributed an insignificant 4% to the total power generation in 2003, after a fourfold rise and a stability in the uses of the former and the later respectively, compared to initial figure.
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by Tourist Information Office in one city a six-month period in 2011 67
- the chart below show the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 58
- Internet Users as percentage of population 61
- Even though globalization affect the world’s economic in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , coal
...try became more dependent on natural gas,coal and renewable sources. In 1985, over...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spectively, compared to initial figure.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 937.175257732 111% => OK
No of words: 204.0 206.0 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10294117647 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69600267273 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 127.690721649 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593137254902 0.622605031667 95% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 290.88556701 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3957738095 44.8134815571 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.125 76.5299724578 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 16.8248392259 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 4.34317383033 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202290293573 0.216113520407 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955125687895 0.0766984524023 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903862555234 0.0603063233224 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144244166849 0.12726935374 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943998827124 0.0580467560999 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 8.37731958763 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 70.7449484536 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 7.45979381443 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 8.71597938144 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 41.2886597938 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.