The chart below shows the percentage of Australian people who were born in different places of the world.
The line chart given illustrates the propotion of individuals from dissimilar regions who live in Australia from 1976 to 2011. Categorically speaking, most of the portions experienced an upward trend except for the figure for the UK which underwent a downward trend.
In 1976, the propotions of people coming from the UK and other regions living in Australia were significantly higher than that of Asia, with 14% and 12% as opposed to merely 3% respectively. There were initial increases in both figures for the UK and other regions, with the former dropping to 10% and the latter generally falling to 8% in 1992. Meanwhile, the ratio of the Asian saw a ceiling trend, going up to 6% in 1992.
By contrast, an general increasing trend in both figures for other regions and Asia was recorded, with the former peaking at 14% and the latter leaping to 6% in 2006; both datas then experienced a rise, but the figure for Asia improved faster to 15% in 2011 compared to 13% of that of other regions in 2011. Meanwhile, the figure for the UK continually dived to 5% in 2011. Despite all the fluctuation with a bottomost mark at 2011, occupying 21% in the period of time between 1976 and 2011, the total ratio saw a growth.
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian people who were born in different places of the world 11
- Walking is known to be beneficial for health and yet fewer and fewer people are walking these days What are the reasons for this What can be done to tackle this problem 56
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...going up to 6% in 1992. By contrast, an general increasing trend in both figure...
^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...most mark at 2011, occupying 21% in the period of time between 1976 and 2011, the total ratio ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 937.175257732 107% => OK
No of words: 215.0 206.0 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68372093023 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65289213284 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539534883721 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 290.88556701 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.156521436 44.8134815571 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.875 76.5299724578 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 16.8248392259 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 4.34317383033 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.043642904905 0.216113520407 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226477620729 0.0766984524023 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310463247874 0.0603063233224 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0373750437442 0.12726935374 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268654181857 0.0580467560999 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 8.37731958763 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 70.7449484536 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 8.71597938144 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 41.2886597938 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.