The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart below illustrates the data about the survey's result about people purchasing coffee and tea and drinking habit reported in five particular cities in Australia. In general, people who went to a cafe for coffee and tea accounted for the highest percentage in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, and Hobart.
It could be easily observed from the bar chart that the population of all cities except Adelaide prefer coffee and ted at a cafe, from 55 to nearly 65 percent. Instant coffee, except for Adelaide city, represents from 45 to well over 55 percent of payment in four weeks.
In comparison with the figures for ordering coffee or tea directly at a cafe and buying instant coffee, that of fresh coffee in most Australia cities is relatively lower. While in Sydney, Melbourne, and Hobart, around 40 percent of purchasing a coffee for fresh product, there is no more than 35 percent of customers in Brisbane and Adelaide for fresh coffee in the last for weeks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-23 | Phạm Hoàng Trung | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- The chart below shows the average hours worked per day by married men and women in paid employment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- In today s world private companies rather than government pay for and conduct most scientific research Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 87
- Some people believe that purchasing imported agricultural products has positive effect Others think consuming domestic products is better Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via different media in one country in 2013 2015 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...5 percent of payment in four weeks. In comparison with the figures for ordering coffee or...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, while, except for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 937.175257732 86% => OK
No of words: 165.0 206.0 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86666666667 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52970597202 2.54303337028 99% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 127.690721649 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 290.88556701 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 16.3608247423 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.0197069977 44.8134815571 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 76.5299724578 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 16.8248392259 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 4.34317383033 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218801641236 0.216113520407 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127601581495 0.0766984524023 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146159193539 0.0603063233224 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163858957205 0.12726935374 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129760121342 0.0580467560999 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 8.37731958763 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 7.45979381443 169% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 8.71597938144 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 8.54432989691 150% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.