The chart shows requests for information at a tourist office in the United Kingdom from January to June.
The diagram depicts the frequency people contacting to tourist office to ask for information by three methods including in person, by letter or mail and by telephone in the United State from January to June. Overall, either number of contacts to the tourist office in person or by telephone grew substantially, whereas the number of contacts direct at the tourist office increased from the lowest to the predominant, followed by telephone. By contrast, sending emails or letters to tourist office plunged considerably during this period.
In January, in-person information requests were the lowest among the 3 demographics (just over 400), after which saw a double increase to 800 in March and then its figure rose steadily to 1000. From mid-March onward, in-person queries rocketed consistently and finally ended with the figure being recorded at approximately 1900 in June.
Turning to the remaining means of contact to the tourist office, telephone requests fluctuated from roughly 900 to 1000 between January and March and stayed unchanged until April before reaching 1600 in June. Notably, letter and email requests witnessed a converse pattern, its figure started at below 800 in January, followed by a plunge in the next 3 months (approximately 600) and finally hit a bottom at about 390.
- The chart shows requests for information at a tourist office in the United Kingdom from January to June 84
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2018 and 2021 78
- Many people think technological devices such as smart phones tablets and mobile phones bring more disadvantages than advantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some experts suggest that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The maps below shows university sports courts in 1990 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 26.3917525773 189% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 937.175257732 116% => OK
No of words: 207.0 206.0 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27053140097 4.54256449028 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79135100116 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 127.690721649 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 290.88556701 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 16.3608247423 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.4600449862 44.8134815571 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.857142857 76.5299724578 204% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 16.8248392259 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 4.34317383033 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332276590563 0.216113520407 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144885996525 0.0766984524023 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808050871403 0.0603063233224 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206383458548 0.12726935374 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845637702896 0.0580467560999 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 8.37731958763 217% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 70.7449484536 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 7.45979381443 196% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 8.71597938144 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 41.2886597938 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 8.54432989691 159% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.