The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now.

The given diagram depicts how a central has been developed between 20 years ago and present day

Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the central library has undergone remarkable modification and reorganization with encompassing the addition of more recreational facilities and more blank space.

From 2 decades ago until now, the children’s books room has been moved to the opposite corner on the left side and expanded to allow for two sofas and storytelling events. Below, there used to be a place for adult fiction books, but now it has been converted into a place for finding some kind of books to consult. Additionally, the reading room containing newspapers and magazines situated next to the entrance to the library has been transformed into a room for computer systems.

In the middle of the library, there was two groupings of tables and chairs 20 years ago, which now has been eliminated to make more blank space for the library. Next to the entrance on the right side of the library, the addition of café has taken the place of enquiry desk for asking for book returns and purchasing tickets. Above it, there an adult non-fiction books space has been reconstructed with the addition of three self-service machines, a desk for asking information and adult fiction books. The initial former location of the children’s area located on the top right corner is a room for lectures now.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-26 nobitaa 78 view
Essays by user nobitaa :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ped between 20 years ago and present day Looking from an overall perspective, it ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, kind of
/var/www/anaconda2/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vaderSentiment/vaderSentiment.py:242: UnicodeWarning: Unicode equal comparison failed to convert both arguments to Unicode - interpreting them as being unequal
if chr in self.emojis:

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.85567010309 311% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 937.175257732 128% => OK
No of words: 239.0 206.0 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01255230126 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79456564978 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 127.690721649 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539748953975 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 290.88556701 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 16.3608247423 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4199829603 44.8134815571 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.75 76.5299724578 196% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 16.8248392259 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 4.34317383033 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15259469459 0.216113520407 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658896656475 0.0766984524023 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627722263654 0.0603063233224 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113422440314 0.12726935374 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736811050382 0.0580467560999 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 8.37731958763 204% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 70.7449484536 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 7.59969072165 122% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 41.2886597938 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 8.62886597938 226% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 8.54432989691 159% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.