The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the proportion of water consumption for three different objectives in six regions in the globe .
It is noticeable that in developing areas including Asia regions, Africa and South America , water use for agriculture dominates other purposes. Meanwhile, in more developed regions, water for industrial use makes up the largest percentage of the total water consumption . In contrast , water for household use has the lowest ratio.
Looking at more details, the proportion of water consumption in Central Asia was the biggest among the four developing areas, stands at 80%, followed by the figures for Africa and South East Asia, which are 84% and 81 % respectively . The water use for household reason ranks second in almost regions above, ranging from 7% to 19%, except for South East Asia where the figure is 5% smaller than the one for the industry.
In more wealthy countries, the consumption of water for industry zone is similarly about a half of the overall usage, particularly with 48% in North America and 53% in Europe . On the other hand, in North America, the percentage of water used for agriculture sector is three times greater than for domestic one while the discrepancy in Europe is over twice .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-12 | Dileep Kumar 62 | 78 | view |
| 2018-03-22 | isana35 | 73 | view |
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources Do you agree or disagree 92
- Topic: Fast food is now universally in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that this is a positive trend while others not.What is your opinion on this? 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 73
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t objectives in six regions in the globe . It is noticeable that in developing...
^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g Asia regions, Africa and South America , water use for agriculture dominates oth...
^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ercentage of the total water consumption . In contrast , water for household use h...
^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he total water consumption . In contrast , water for household use has the lowest ...
^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he four developing areas, stands at 80%, followed by the figures for Africa and S...
^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sia, which are 84% and 81 % respectively . The water use for household reason rank...
^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...h 48% in North America and 53% in Europe . On the other hand, in North America, th...
^^
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the discrepancy in Europe is over twice .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, similarly, so, while, except for, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 937.175257732 111% => OK
No of words: 203.0 206.0 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10344827586 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72415808339 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 127.690721649 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581280788177 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 290.88556701 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7613052482 44.8134815571 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 76.5299724578 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 16.8248392259 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 4.34317383033 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 2.54639175258 314% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228245576627 0.216113520407 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122543239189 0.0766984524023 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502753874692 0.0603063233224 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153929868566 0.12726935374 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459779141197 0.0580467560999 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 8.37731958763 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 70.7449484536 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 7.45979381443 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 8.71597938144 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 41.2886597938 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.