The given pie charts represent the percentage of British University students in London during 2000 and 2010 who spoke different foreign languages other than English.
Overall, the number of scholars were able to handle one extra language is increased considerably in 2010 whereas , majority of pupils spoke Spanish than the rest of the languages.
To begin with,in 2000, a third of the total aspirants were speaking Spanish, which then rose to 35% in 2010. Similarly, there was a growth of 5% in both another language and two other languages by 2010, which increased to 20% and 15% respectively. In contrast, a decline of 5% showed in the percentage of French only speakers, which reduced from 15% to 10%. Also, the pupils who did not speak no other languages was initially a fifth which fell to a tenth in the second chart.
However, the number of college students know only German remained constant in both the academic period at the rate of 10%.
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. Summ 89
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 78
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e number of scholars were able to handle one extra language is increased consider...
^^
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...extra language is increased considerably in 2010 whereas , majority of pupils spo...
^^
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... increased considerably in 2010 whereas , majority of pupils spoke Spanish than t...
^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...he rest of the languages. To begin with,in 2000, a third of the total aspirants we...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, similarly, so, then, third, whereas, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 32.9175257732 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 937.175257732 84% => OK
No of words: 162.0 206.0 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87037037037 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.78020617076 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5784831602 2.54303337028 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 127.690721649 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623456790123 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 290.88556701 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.4189171556 44.8134815571 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 76.5299724578 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 16.8248392259 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 4.34317383033 296% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277599155189 0.216113520407 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117554740504 0.0766984524023 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722433255206 0.0603063233224 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153506539474 0.12726935374 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801385454238 0.0580467560999 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 8.37731958763 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 70.7449484536 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 8.71597938144 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.